Fri Oct 14, 2005, 09:56am
|
|
In Memoriam
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,211
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Smitty
Quote:
Originally posted by Jurassic Referee
Quote:
Originally posted by David M
JR I know you are correct in this but since both actions are so close timewise I was thinking of calling this a double T instead of a false double foul.
|
I dunno....takes time for B1 to go get the ball, pick it up and throw it. The description sounded like 2 distinct and separate acts to me.
There is one advantage to a double T call imo though. A1 started the crap and B1 retaliated. A1 actually ends up gaining from the situation by getting the T possession after the FT's are over..... and I'm never fond of the instigator gaining anything out of a play like this. The double T would go to the POI, which would be an AP. That does negate A1 gaining even a minute advantage out of the situation.
Of course, if B1 woulda had the brains to just walk away from the push.......
|
I don't think you call the double T here. Team B had the advantage until B1 throws the ball. This is how fights get started. The acts happened separately. Penalize them both.
|
Doesn't a double T penalize them both also? 
|