Quote:
Originally posted by BktBallRef
You're right. Yours is a pretty ****ing stupid example.
Officials get assingments based on rankings. Offiicals get post season assignments based on classifications. Officials get state championship games based on criteria which include taking a closed book NFHS exam in some states. But as long as there are idiots like you who see nothing wrong with giving out the answers, then I guess there are officials like you who will continue to get games they don't deserve. That's for you, drama queen.
|
In your area, maybe. In my area maybe, but not everywhere. People in several areas use the Part I test as a study aid. I am by no means advocating cheating in any form, but if you are in an area where the test doesn't mean anything towards your assignments, state tournament, etc. why not ask for and receive answers to help you in your rules study. IMO, we make way too much of this. My area happens to be one where the test means a little towards rankings, etc., but we take the Part I open book and can freely discuss the questions in groups.
I cna see that I have touched a sensative subject for you. I'm sorry that my schedule has been so upsetting for you. Since you know me so well and have seen my work on the court, you are absolutely qualified to decide what games I should, or shouldn't, get because idiots like me shouldn't get any games. This is exactly the kind of BS that gets spewed when someone gets their feelings hurt when someone else disagrees with an opinion. I think the drama queen tag has been misplaced.
Bottom line as far as I am concerned is don't share information that you are not comfortable sharing. If you want information, ask for it. You have to look at yourself in the mirror. You know if you are cheating. Govern yourself accordingly. No big deal.