View Single Post
  #33 (permalink)  
Old Fri Sep 30, 2005, 02:14am
Camron Rust Camron Rust is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: In the offseason.
Posts: 12,263
Quote:
Originally posted by Jurassic Referee
Quote:
Originally posted by ChuckElias
Quote:
Originally posted by Camron Rust
4-18 FIGHTING
Fighting is a flagrant act and can occur when the ball is dead or live.

10-3 PLAYER TECHNICAL
A player shall not:
ART. 10 . . . Be charged with fighting.
We've had this discussion before, Camron. I was totally on your side on this. But I seem to remember that there was an argument on the other side that fighting could also be personal, instead of technical. Since that discussion, I've always considered live-ball fighting to be a personal foul; but now I can't remember exactly why. . .
Lemme refresh your memory....

Casebook play 10.4.5SitA---live ball fight... RULING: A1 and B1 are charged with flagrant fouls and are disqualified, but no free throws result from the double PERSONAL foul
How do you reconcile the direct contradition in the definition of a fight and technical foul with the case book? They're both valid and and clear. There is no ambiguity in the rule. One is probably a misprint. Which? I can't say for sure. I don't think you can either.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com
Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association
Reply With Quote