View Single Post
  #59 (permalink)  
Old Wed Sep 28, 2005, 03:45pm
mcrowder mcrowder is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Little Elm, TX (NW Dallas)
Posts: 4,047
This may be the extreme picking of nits, and for that I apologize.

But the reasons given by the rulebook for starting the clock on the snap or on the RFP all deal with what happened to end the previous play, and not specifically on what stopped the clock. The difference is minute, and in many cases, the reason the previous play ended and the reason the clock stopped are the same. But there IS a difference, and it is that minute difference that is causing a few of our posters (even some of the more knowledgeable ones) to rule incorrectly in this case.

I'm not saying IGNORE (or if I did, I'm amending!) the previous play - I'm saying to FOCUS in the reason we start the clock on the RFP or the snap instead of the reason it stopped in the first place.
__________________
"Many baseball fans look upon an umpire as a sort of necessary evil to the luxury of baseball, like the odor that follows an automobile." - Hall of Fame Pitcher Christy Mathewson
Reply With Quote