Thread: MAKE THE CALL
View Single Post
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 01, 2001, 09:34am
Dakota Dakota is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Twin Cities MN
Posts: 8,154
Is intent required?

Would a runner who was so ignorant of the situation to have passed a runner in front of her suddenly become aware that she was out, and would continue to run with the intent of drawing a throw? Unlikley.

So, for the sake of argument, say she was not running with intent to draw a throw. Does this matter?

ASA 8-8-P says, in part, When, after being declared out or scoring, a runner intentionally interferes with a defensive player's opportunity to make a play on another runner... A runner continuing to run and drawing a throw may be considered a form of interference.

Interesting wording. The notion of "intent" is not repeated in the statement about drawing a throw -- only that it happens -- but the statement uses the phrase may be considered, not is a form of interference.

If it MAY be, then there are times when it MAY NOT be.

Is judging intent the deciding factor?
Reply With Quote