Thread: Flagrant or Not
View Single Post
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Mon Aug 15, 2005, 02:58pm
tmp44 tmp44 is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: PA
Posts: 446
I'm confused by the third interp., unless the evaluator (or whoever told you this) was meaning that it's a flag. T, which is only one technical plus an ejection (he "sits the rest of the game" part?).

It doesn't have to be physical to be flagrant; non-physical contact can have the same result. You just have to decide whether you think it's deserving; IMO, this is 50-50, but I probably would have only T'd, not tossed.
__________________
I know God would never give me more than I could handle, I just wish he wouldn't trust me so much.
Reply With Quote