View Single Post
  #55 (permalink)  
Old Mon Aug 15, 2005, 07:01am
Bob M. Bob M. is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Clinton Township, NJ
Posts: 2,065
Quote:
Originally posted by jimbo
I'm new to this board and have just spent the last hour reading through this thread. Interesting to say the least.

I know this has been beaten to death, but one thing no one has mentioned is the definition of fouls (2-16).

This particular foul, a substitute entering the field during the down and not participating, cannot be a nonplayer foul according to the definition: a noncontact foul while the ball is dead or during the down which is not illegal participation and does not influence the play in progress (2-16-2e).

Because this foul is now labeled illegal participation it no longer fits the definition of a nonplayer foul.

It's obvious (and disappointing) that the rule was not thoroughly thought through as there are conflicting rules regarding this.
REPLY: You're absolutely correct. That's one of the things that needs to be cleaned up. You can't call it a non-player foul and then penalize it as illegal participation.
__________________
Bob M.
Reply With Quote