View Single Post
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Sat Aug 13, 2005, 10:46am
Rich Ives Rich Ives is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,236
Quote:
Originally posted by Dave Hensley
For chrissakes, "willful indifference" is just another way of expressing the same concept described by Jaksa and Roder as "blatant and avoidable."

It applies to base coaches and "other teammates," which is what a batter becomes after a pitch has been mishandled by the catcher.
Not so.

"Blatant" is an overt act.

The people that started using "willful indifference" are ones that, absent any overt act (or intent where it applies), still want to call an out because not calling an out is deemed by them to be unfair.

They're of the same mentality of those who refuse to accept the concept of a "train wreck" and go looking for a reason to "fix" the non-call.

__________________
Rich Ives
Different does not equate to wrong
Reply With Quote