Quote:
Originally posted by CecilOne
I don't think WMB is looking for conspiracy or even hidden meaning. He is such a student ofthe rules and esp. NFHS vs.ASA; that he notices and discusses apparent contradictions, especially when it adds wording or confusion.
|
#1. I know he wasn't looking for a hidden meaning or a conspiracy. Maybe you missed the smilie
#2. This discussion is on an ASA rule. NFHS has no standing.
#3. The excessive wording has no bearing on the understanding of the rule. At best, it points out that the defense may do something devious. At worst, it is a redundancy.