|
Well I will find out tonight as we have our state rules meeting tonight.
As far as I am concerned this is non player because it fits the defintion of a non player foul to a T per the rule book and thus 10-4-5-c does apply. But we will see.
I also seriously doubt the Fed is looking at this possibly being potentionally a 30, 45, 85 or whatever type foul and thus the reason they stated it is a basic spot foul (as an additional reason on top of it being non player). If you can have player and non player fouls for USC, why not for IP. While I agree tradionally IP has not been I cannot see why the Fed would intend for this to be looked as strictly a player foul when by their own long standing definition it is not.
__________________
Jim
Need an out, get an out. Need a run, balk it in.
|