View Single Post
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Tue Aug 09, 2005, 08:07pm
BktBallRef BktBallRef is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,616
Quote:
Originally posted by devdog69
Quote:
Originally posted by BktBallRef
The correct ruling should have been a personal foul, not a technical foul He could certainly rule the foul either flagrant or intentional if he chose to. But the foul should have been personal, as it was a live ball, contact foul. 2 FTs by the shooter and the ball for the shooter's team would be the correct penalty. No other player would be allowed to shoot.
...unless the fouled player was injured in which case her substitute would shoot the free throws and we would inbound the ball on the baseline, in this case.
I based my response on what was written, not what else might possibly happen. He said nothing about the shooter being injured.

[Edited by BktBallRef on Aug 10th, 2005 at 10:01 AM]
__________________
"...as cool as the other side of the pillow." - Stuart Scott

"You should never be proud of doing the right thing." - Dean Smith
Reply With Quote