View Single Post
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Mon Aug 08, 2005, 09:44pm
Mark Dexter Mark Dexter is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 4,801
I'd have to know a bit more about the incident, but it sounds like the penalty was administered incorrectly.

If the foul was a flagrant personal foul on the shooter, during the shooting motion, only 2 FT's should have been awarded (unless it was a 3-pt try).

If the foul was a flagrant technical (non-contact) foul on the shooter, then the basket should have been determined based on if it was made/missed. Then 2 FT's should have been awarded to any player on team A.

If a combination occurred - B1 fouled A1, and then B1 committed a flagrant technical foul (she bumps A1 on the arm, then taunts A1 flagrantly), then A1 would recieve 2 FT's for the shot (assuming it missed), and any A team player would be awarded 2 FT's for the flagrant technical.

A gets the ball back either way (because of the flagrant foul). If the flagrant is personal, then A gets the ball nearest the spot of the foul. If the flagrant foul is technical, then A gets the ball at the division line opposite the scorer's table.
__________________
"To win the game is great. To play the game is greater. But to love the game is the greatest of all."
Reply With Quote