View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 17, 2001, 03:24pm
Dan_ref Dan_ref is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Just north of hell
Posts: 9,250
Send a message via AIM to Dan_ref
Re: Defence of assignment.

Quote:
Originally posted by newbieref
I agree the assign ment is pretty lame, but its what you have to do. I completely agree that officials shouldnt be in it for the money, if they wanted that they should go be a doctor or trial lawyer. Contributing to the sport should much more be the goal.

And they teach that in class. But since its a college class they need some work for people to do and this is one of the things along with watching games (at least 10) and seeing how the offcials cover it (posistioning,signaling, comunication, aperance ect ect) and interviewing some one who has ref'ed at at least high school level for several years. This class isnt to give in depth looks for a sport (it covers 5-6) less in depth so studying rules isnt the main factor.

I feel Im justified.

Newbieref.
I hope that along with investigating what the "big
dogs" make you get a chance to see what the "little dogs"
make, and then include the ratio of "big dogs" to "little
dogs". It's a lot like the entertainment business, most
actors/writers/musicians not even scraping by on their
art, a small handfull making a living and a very small
handfull making tons.
Reply With Quote