Thread: Question 65
View Single Post
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Fri Aug 05, 2005, 08:26am
Topshelf Topshelf is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 19
I would say that he is in an illegal formation, because he is not on the line of scrimmage and not in the backfield. In 2-30-3 there is an exception for a player to be in this position only if he is under the snapper.

I do, however, agree that I have not seen the term "illegal position". I think you would have an illegal formation.
Reply With Quote