|
KWH, we know basic penalty enforcement and it's not the issue. We have already decided that and we're all well aware of 10.6 having learned that as cadets. I'm not "reading into" anything, but simply simply referencing the words they printed in the case book on page 71. I was curious as to whether there was an exception in this case where they specifically didn't want all-but-one applied thinking they didn't want the huge penalty enforced for some stupid infraction so benign. Look at the words on page 71 and you'll see what I mean.
I'm in total agreement on keeping the hankie in the pocket and not giving some ridiculous 40-yard penalty.
|