[Ref in PA]

I apply the Tower Principle to contact during the basketball game, rather than to violations. I am sure I have applied this philosophy to violations from time to time (such as the point guard slightly carrying the ball as he dribbles up court with no pressure on him). However, there are certain violations that are black and white - did the ball bounce oob? was there a bc violation? was the ball kicked? was the pivot foot switched? etc. Violations are much more defined, whereas contact is judged before it becomes a foul.

I think to ref advantage/disadvantage with violations is the wrong mind set. In the case being discussed in this thread - defense going oob, the rules state this to be a violation. We do not have much of a choice (unless you deem it an unsportsmanlike conduct technical foul). You could purposely *miss* the call, but I disagree with the philosophy of holding the whistle until the play is overwith and then making a call. If you pass on the play, you live with it, otherwise, call it when it happens.

I think a ref who makes delayed violation calls after the play is done will lose credibility with partners and coaches. Just my opinion.