|
WK - the way you want it is in fact how it works. If a player affects the play it's an all-but-one situation; otherwise, the way I'm reading it then it's not. From what I understand it's darn near similar to how the old non-player illegal substitution foul worked, except that the one bit of phrasing that took place in the case book correction has me confused.
It changed the word from "basic" to "succeeding" which leads me to believe if A had scored during the play the score could possibly stand with enforcement on the try, hence a succeeding spot. If it remained at basic spot and A had scored, then enforce the IP from the goal line as a live-ball player foul. I'm still confused on this component of it.
From the comments in the case book though it appears as though the way you think it should work, it indeed does.
|