View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jul 27, 2005, 02:16pm
GarthB GarthB is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 4,222
Quote:
Originally posted by LilLeaguer
Quote:
Originally posted by LDUB
JM's protest is the same thing. He saw something, and he assumed the umpire saw the same thing.
I feel confident, if JM actually acts anything like he posts, that he usually goes out onto the field with two goals:

1. Convince the umpire to change the call.
2. Bait the umpire into a winnable protest.

-LL [/B]
Seems correct to me. Coaches, all coaches, are lobbyists. They do not say "boo" to an umpire without having a desired result in mind. Experienced umpires understand this and limit their conversations accordingly. Unfortunately, some newer umpires are not aware of this and, on occasion, in an effort to help a coach, say something in a manner that really didn't reflect their actions or understanding only to have it used against them. (again, there is a reason they are called Rats)

One of the good Texas umpires I know has, for years, advocated responses of five words or less to all questions from coaches. I adopted that a couple of years ago and it works extremely well.
__________________
GB
Reply With Quote