[QUOTE]
Originally posted by BktBallRef
[B][QUOTE]
Originally posted by zebraman55
[B]
Quote:
Originally posted by BktBallRef
Okay zeb, if you're going to post on these forums, you need to understand the difference in 9-5-1d and 9.5.1d. 
9-5-1d is a rule reference. 9.5.1D is a case book reference.
Quote:
In the play above, there is no way I will be able to enforce this rule.
I still do not see the unsportsmanlike conduct on this one......there is absolutely no way for me to know that the QB vocal signals is intended to be......
|
This play is directly on point with the original post. It's USC and that's the way the NF expects it to be called. If the QB does that, talks to his SE and then goes back to the huddle, then we have nothing. However, when the ball is snapped, it's obvious that the verbage is intended to deceive.
[Edited by BktBallRef on Sep 11th, 2001 at 09:41 AM]
|
BktBallref: thanks for the lesson! In my haste, I failed to recognize the "dots" versus "dashes". Thanks for your patience!
However, are we reading into this play? I reviewed the case book and the rule book. As an official on this play, I do not know that the QB is calling out the split ends last name. I can tell b his actions that he is attempting to get the Split Ends attention. And, is that the condition we are saying is UC? Hmmmmm........
zeb