[ABoselli]

My take on Kukar's comments is in line with what most of us use as our philosophy - did the foul impact the play? Kukar was, in effect, saying to the guy, "This is a game turning play. Did the foul you saw have an effect? Are you absolutely positive?" The H stuck with it, and rightly so, as I recall. Didn't then DE or the OLB hold the TE off the line preventing him from getting into his pattern? On any pass play, especially one where there's a sack or a hit on the QB while he still has the ball (because the defense has gained a definite advantage by keeping receivers from running their patterns illegally) a defensive hold has a definite impact on the play.

It appears Ramtime feels that is evidence that Kukar was trying to favor the Patriots.

Anybody else got a beef from games played years ago? Maybe some UM faithful could pontificate about how their DB didn't mug the OSU wideout?