|
Nah,
I got his point.
There seems to be an ongoing discourse on the internet concerning "how" posts are written rather than what is in them.
On another website there is a dicussion currently on "why do umpires look for the smallest of incorrectness in a post and then attack it rather than recognize the real issue and spend time on that" . . .
And I think that is a valid point.
I get tired of posts that comment how dumb a TV announcer is because he used the term "foul tip" when the ball is actually just a "foul ball" --
Skip Carey just the other night: "That ball was foul tipped back to the screen."
Is that so bad? I know he should have said: "And that ball was tipped foul back to the screen."
Side Bar:
That reminds me of George Carlin to Johnny Carson: "Well Johnny I just don't get things, I can say, 'I pricked my finger', but I better not say, 'I fingered my prick.'"
Back on point:
Simply because a poster tried to answer quickly does it mean anything "iffin' he missppells" or missptypes sometin'!
I don't think so.
It is just another little rat thing Rich is doing.
|