Quote:
Originally posted by tpaul
A41 and B25 are running stride-for-stride near the sideline. Their feet inadvertently become tangled and both players lose their balance. When their feet became tangled (a) both players were looking for the ball; (b) neither player was looking for the ball; or (c) A41 was looking for the ball, but B25 was not.
I read this play and wanted to see what you guys think?
|
In NF, covered word for word in casebook 7.5.10d of 2004 casebook. No foul in A and B, but DPI in C.
In NCAA I cannot find the an AR to cover it, but there is one saying if there feet get tangled, no foul, but no mention to if B is not looking back and A is. I think it would be no foul in A and B, but a foul in C as well.