View Single Post
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 30, 2005, 06:35am
Matthew F Matthew F is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 111
Quote:
Originally posted by LDUB
I don't know the history, but how is this confusing?
b) With a runner on first base the pitcher may make a complete turn, without hesitating toward first, and throw to second. This is not to be interpreted as throwing to an unoccupied base.

vs.

(2) Runners on first and second, pitcher in set position. Runner bluffs going to third base and pitcher throws to third base. However, runner did not go. Ruling: Balk, pursuant to Official Baseball Rule 8.05(d).


In the first statement, it appears that you have a runner on a base and are allowed to throw to a succeeding base without the runner going there. In the second statement, it appears that you have runner on a base and are NOT allowed to throw to a succeeding base without the runner going there. The ONLY difference, it appears, is the base involved - second vs. third ?!?!


Reply With Quote