View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jun 27, 2005, 01:35pm
Bob M. Bob M. is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Clinton Township, NJ
Posts: 2,065
REPLY: Joe...I think I understand your point. But Warrenkicker's reply makes me wonder if I really do. I still think you're correct on both points made in your original post. Warrenkicker's mention of case play 8.2.2 Sit B is not related to your original play--at least I don't think it is. In 8.2.2-B, the premise is that the hold by A10 is prior to the change of possession, so it's excluded from any consideration of carry-over to the try anyway. B could always accept the penalty for the hold and take the 2 points, but they'd need to give up the TD. Now in some cases, they might want to do that, but rarely. But the point of the case play is that they can't have both the TD and the holding penalty enforced on the subsequent try.
__________________
Bob M.
Reply With Quote