View Single Post
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jun 21, 2005, 08:56am
Matthew F Matthew F is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 111
Correct. The batter shouldn't be called for interference unless he moves (after F2 has received the pitch) in a way that prevents or hinders F2 from making a play on the runner. I don't believe the interference has to be intentional - The batter is responsible for his movements (That's why they should be taught to just stand still in this sitch).

Reply With Quote