Tim, I agree with you about the ruling in the game. It was done just the way it should have been.
Do you think, Tim, that maybe they should consider changing the rule so that only one team is warned, the team that actually threw at someone?
Do you have any opinion on that?
Quote:
Originally posted by Tim C
cowboyfan . . . I'll type Reeeealll slow.
Because that is the way the rule is written.
The warning is ALWAYS argued that it isn't fair to the team that hasn't thrown yet.
It is not an overreaction . . . the fukking pitch went BEHIND the hitter.
Yep, I couldn't help taking a shot . . . and I will continue to do it to people who REFUSE to understand the way things work when done correctly.
Shoot, you probably agree with McClellen last year when he screwed the pooch.
EDIT:
Jim:
Do you really think that the crew (and maybe even the Commishes Office) didn't discuss this issue before the game? Do you really think that the PU decision was made without ANY OTHER input?
I am not sure that your post is not the one that is "taking a shot".
[Edited by Tim C on Jun 8th, 2005 at 08:37 PM]
|