View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jun 08, 2005, 12:08pm
Bob M. Bob M. is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Clinton Township, NJ
Posts: 2,065
Quote:
Originally posted by ljudge
OK, getting technical what if a player loses a mouthpiece and says "ref I need a new mouthpiece" after the RFP has been given? I would expect criticism of not following "common sense" if I made the team take a timeout. But I would technically be following the rules if I made a player to that. Would you agree?

I actually had this very situation come up last year and I simply stopped the game and allowed the player to go over to the sideline and someone threw him another one. I re-chopped and we resumed play. No one questioned it but I probably didn't follow the rules properly.
REPLY: I don't see anything wrong with taking an official's TO and allowing that. I believe that the intention of prohibiting help from the sideline is meant to keep attendants from entering the field/huddle to help repair equipment that has become illegal through use. Just having sideline personnel throw a new mouthpiece onto the field doesn't really appear to violate that principle. If they weren't prepared to get him a new mouthpiece quickly, I would suggest that they get a replacement in for him and let him address the problem on the sideline while the game continues. I think common sense should prevail. Now...that's my opinion; others may disagree.
__________________
Bob M.
Reply With Quote