|
Garth, I did check the old list (thats where I picked up Moose, Carl votes etc.)but it was late and I missed yours. Sorry. I skipped over the ambivalent ones too or the ones which seemed more philosiphical where no definite stance was obvious.
I know it's not done by vote. The one official ruling is a precedent though.
We can all be surprised by official utterance too. The "advantageous fourth out at first" was one - even Carl was amazed. (See "Was Carl Wrong" in Carl's section on URC)
However, absent the official ruling, what's wrong with a debate?
__________________
Rich Ives
Different does not equate to wrong
|