I'm thinking I would make every effort to contact either the authors or perhaps someone up my chain of command to find out why the authors put in a statement so clearly in contradiction to the rules, and if this is supposed to be a new interpretation of the rules (or even a future FED rule change), or if it's just a mistake.
Books like this DO have mistakes on occasion. And often, rulings in books like this do not hold up in protest meetings, when the rulebook clearly states something different.
A conundrum, no doubt.
|