Sat May 21, 2005, 11:36pm
|
|
Official Forum Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Kaukauna, WI
Posts: 832
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Mark Padgett
Quote:
Originally posted by mplagrow
On the other hand, if you've got no shot clock, this penalty can keep the game moving when a team is trying to stall.
|
Uh-uh. If a team is "stalling" the clock still runs. If you continue to call violations because someone is standing within six feet of a dribbler, the clock stops.
That's one of the reasons I think the five (not on the inbound) and ten second violations should not apply in games with a shot clock.
If you have a 30 second shot clock, what the heck difference does it make if you spend 9 seconds in the back court and 20 in the front court before a shot, or if you spend 20 seconds in the back court and 9 in the front court? With the defense allowed to play full court, it shouldn't matter.
If your goal is to "force the action", then put in a twenty second shot clock.
[Edited by mark padgett on May 21st, 2005 at 07:57 PM]
|
I agree with that. If there's a shot clock, let them spend all the time in the back court that they want.
__________________
Quitters never win, winners never quit, but those who never win AND never quit are idiots.
|