I am trying to understand. I have you and Tee telling me you move your head height up if you move back and I have DTTB saying that your head height should not change.
Now I am confused, which one is it?
Quote:
Originally posted by GarthB
""Assuming you lock in at the same head height each time, backing up will not help you see more of the plate." That is what I was referring to....
Really???
You vary your head height in the Gerry Davis stance.
I did not know that."
Now it appears you're choosing to not understand.
When I said you are not referring to the GD stance I was referring to your comment about keeping your head at the same postion as you back up. In the GD stance, you are further back and your head is higher then in the heel/toe stance. This way, contrary to your first position to Carl, one CAN see the plate better.
I'll take a page from Tee's book here. I'm done with this thread. Read Carl's dissertation at officiating.com or wait for Tee's column.
|
__________________
Well I am certainly wiser than this man. It is only too likely that neither of us has any knowledge to boast of; but he thinks that he knows something which he does not know, whereas I am quite conscious of my ignorance. At any rate it seems that I am wiser than he is to this small extent, that I do not think that I know what I do not know. ~Socrates
|