View Single Post
  #62 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 16, 2005, 10:07am
ChuckElias ChuckElias is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Western Mass.
Posts: 9,105
Send a message via AIM to ChuckElias
Quote:
Originally posted by ysong
But how many players do the "stepping" instead of jumping when they "run" the layups? except during pre-game warmups.
I'm pretty sure that when establish a pivot foot while moving (like when taking a lay-up), there's no difference between a jump and a step (4-43-2). Also, it's JMO, but I see more travels during pre-game lay-up lines, than I do on lay-ups during the game.

Quote:
I'd like to say too often (if not always) the runing layups are done by jump-jump.

I'm not sure what kind of games you're working, but that just isn't the case around here. The jump stop is pretty rare around here (I'd guesstimate 5%-10% of all drives to the basketin boys' games), especially compared to regular lay-ups.

Quote:
So how do you draw a line here, between an ok jump-jump and a not-ok jump-jump? each ref may have a different creterion.

That's not the fault of the rule; that's inconsistency in application. An ok jump-stop occurs when a player:

1) catches the ball in the air;
2) lands on one foot;
3) jumps off that foot; and
4) lands simulaneously on both feet ( 4-43-2a(3) ).

Officials tend to be lax in applying the "simultaneously" standard. But that doesn't mean that what the rule states is somehow unclear.

Quote:
Without this rule, it may make the game more enjoyable. after catching the ball when runing, the player will be allowed to drastically change his/hers direction and "jump" away from the defender to take shot. Without this rule, the basketball will be more basketball. people legalized the jump shot for the same reason, right?
I'm sorry, but I don't understand what you're getting at. How will removing a rule allow a player to change direction drastically? What rule is preventing that now? I just don't understand what you're trying to say. Sorry.

And I'm already on record as saying that I dislike the jump-stop. I think it's clearly a travel, since the player leaves the floor with the ball and returns to the floor with the ball. However, I understand that it's legal b/c of the very specific language describing how the pivot is established. Since there's no pivot when the player leaves the floor (after jumping off one foot), it's not a travel when he comes back down (since the pivot hasn't been lifted and returned). Bad rule, IMO, but that's the way it is.
__________________
Any NCAA rules and interpretations in this post are relevant for men's games only!
Reply With Quote