Quote:
Originally posted by Jurassic Referee
The only real difference is they've changed their minds about calling an intentional foul if the coach says "foul "em". I don't blame them for backing down on that one, because that was a dumb interpretation anyway- and one that most everybody ignored if the defender went for the ball.
|
I agree, JR.
My rationalization for calling the act, and not the verbal command, was that the player may not have heard the coach, which made the coach's command moot.
mick