View Single Post
  #38 (permalink)  
Old Tue May 10, 2005, 02:51pm
tmp44 tmp44 is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: PA
Posts: 446
Quote:
Originally posted by Camron Rust
Quote:
Originally posted by rainmaker
Quote:
Originally posted by BktBallRef
Good grief.

Let's forget the IF'S and establish a scenario!

B1 fouls A1. This results in a personal foul.

A1 curses the official. This results in a technical foul.

The fouls occur at the EXACT SAME TIME.

How are the fouls penalized under 2005-2006 NFHS rules?
Okay. But before we beat that one to death, let's establish a different scenario (call it situation D), in which B1 fouls A1, resulting in a pf, and A1 curses B1 resulting in a T. Would that be a false double foul?
Not a false double foul.

The definition of false double foul says:
A false double foul is a situation in which there are fouls by both teams, the second of which occurs before the clock is started following the first, and such that at least one of the attributes of a double foul is absent.

It's also not a double foul since the infractions were not committed against each other.

All that's left is simultaneous.

Penalty in the new rules...not sure.

Under the old rules, I belive the AP arrow would be used and the throwin spot would be determined by the foul of the team without the arrow.
Juulie,

Is your scenario (D) where the PF on B1 occurs at the same time as the TF on A1? Or is where PF on B1 occurs and then the TF on A1? I'm guessing because of this thread that it's the former, I just wanted to be sure. Because if it's the latter, then you shoot 1+1 for PF on B1 and then 2+possession for TF on A1.
__________________
I know God would never give me more than I could handle, I just wish he wouldn't trust me so much.
Reply With Quote