Tue Jul 24, 2001, 10:05am
|
|
In Memoriam
|
|
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Houghton, U.P., Michigan
Posts: 9,953
|
|
Re: Re: Re: My two cents
Quote:
Originally posted by Carl Childress
Quote:
Originally posted by Patrick Szalapski
Quote:
|
Me? I gotta "see" a fair ball.
|
Really? I've always had the opposite attitude. A batted ball is fair until it is proven to me otherwise. Is this not good to have?
P-Sz
|
Pat: The answer to your question is: That is not "good to have." It's the principle of "benefit of the doublt," which all veteran umpires understand.
Consider: (1) If you don't see a tag, the runner is .... (2) If you don't see the batter swing, it is a ....
Thus, if you don't SEE the ball fair, it is ....
(Of course, the opposite would be true, but that is not in keeping with the clear tradition of calling instances 1 and 2 above.)
There's a philosophical point embedded in the nature of baseball: Pointing a ball "fair" is a decision that instantly affects the progress of the game. Calling that ball "foul" merely postpones the moment of truth. So, if you are guessing about fair/foul, your best chance of NOT affecting the outcome is to signal "foul."
|
Carl,
Perhaps what P-Sz was implying, and I am in agreement with regard to the fair/foul ball, a batted ball is live until it is dead. ;-)
mick
|