Quote:
Originally posted by BktBallRef
Quote:
Originally posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.
Packer was also moaning and groaning about moving screens were not being called as fouls. But I just consider the source.
MTD, Sr.
|
While that is true, there were several screens that were "set," and I use that term loosely, by Illnois that were not shall we say "by the book." It happened early in the game and only got waorse later when it became aapparent that it was going to be allowed.
|
I agree that the screens were very much in motion. However, I thought that the UNC player in several occasions diverted around the moving screen rather than running into it...effectively making legel. On some others, I felt that it wasn't set and did cause contact but the defender was too far from the shooter to have contested the try....no advantage...no foul.