Thread: assessement fee
View Single Post
  #26 (permalink)  
Old Tue Mar 29, 2005, 07:57pm
JRutledge JRutledge is offline
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,540
Red face You are too easily offended, but what else is new.

Quote:
Originally posted by zebraman


I have seen many studies on referee shortages and I have never seen where "slaves to the association" or "assigning fees" have been listed as a reason.

I find it very worth it to pay my association to deal with schools in getting games and also in getting paid. I would hate to have to deal with individual AD's to solicit games. My time is much to valuable to be used in that way.
I do not have to solicit games. No one I know has to solicit games. The assignors come looking for you. If they like you, they pick you up. If they do not like you, your phone will never ring and your email with never be full. I turn down more games and opportunities than I accept. Especially when changes come in the schedule or games are added.

Quote:
Originally posted by zebraman
By the way, I find the term "slave" offensive so please find a better way to express your meaning. I joined my association quite voluntarily and I have the choice of officiating or not. I do not get beaten if I choose not to officiate. Your use of the term is in very poor taste.

Z

Well the term "slave" does not offend me. I will use it as I see fit, considering my background and feelings on this issue. You might not get beaten, but you sure are getting screwed for paying a fee that is should be between the schools and the assignor. Or if the assignor is hired to work those games, put the expense in the dues up front just like other expenses. I really do not care what kind of taste you think I have, we do not share the same value system on many things.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote