View Single Post
  #29 (permalink)  
Old Sun Mar 27, 2005, 01:15am
Nevadaref Nevadaref is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,015
Quote:
Originally posted by Daryl H. Long
...
What concerns me is that Kitt's explanation of why ...

Kitt applied the wrong rule to the situation, then misquoted the rule he applied to make it say something it doesn't.

If someone can show me in the NCAA rules where just pulling down on the rim without it touching the ball constitutes BI then I will accept the ruling Kitt gave.


[Edited by Daryl H. Long on Mar 27th, 2005 at 12:23 AM] [/B]

That is an outstanding post! The only thing that could have made it better is if you would have gotten the referee's last name right, Mr. Lon

And I'm quite sure that Rut knows the def of BI has nothing to do with how a goal is made. I think that he was just jumping around in his thoughts when he posted that sentence in the middle of the paragraph.
Of course, I won't speak for him. I just have confidence in him.


Reply With Quote