Quote:
Originally posted by blindzebra
The rules are consistent, but sometimes poorly written.
In the first the dribble ended because of the batted ball. That touching allows a second dribble, which is covered in the second.
|
a lawyer may argue that the second touch does not allow a second dribble, because it does not cause the dribbler to lose control of the ball. I, for one, will not blame the lawyer. (BTW, he is a part-time official)