What are we doing? I have asked Tubby to provide his credentials for evaluating officiating way back on the first page. He has yet to provide these which leads me to believe he is not actually qualifed to evaluate an officials performance. (Comments dripping with sarcasm)
Until he provides such information, ignore him. That is the best solution. Unless he asks a legitimate question regarding rules and philosophy and the question has a tone of sincerety without an agenda (read: want to learn and better educate himself.)
Now, if he does provide his credentials and they are noteworthy, well then I guess we will have to reevaluate his observations. I am not holding my breath on either account.
Note specifically to Tubby:
Any other BS posts that don't meet the criteria as outlined in paragraph two will be summarily deleted by me (provided I see them).