Quote:
Originally posted by zebraman
Quote:
Originally posted by blindzebra
You always have the teams like Maryland, ND, or close mid-majors that get left out and you have these small conferences or upset conf. tournament winners as 13th-16th seeds.
Why not have play in games for all the 13th thru 16th seeds. That gives more deserving teams a shot and adds a better chance of upsets in the first round by putting 64 quality teams into the field.
|
That pretty much ruins the entire idea of seeding. By earning a #1 seed, your reward is that you play the #16 seed. It's kinda how it works. Hello? Just cuz' the season is over doesn't mean you have to dive headlong into the old marijuana habit. 
Z
|
Way to go for an uncalled for insult. I might add that the top seeded team still plays the 64th seeded team, the difference is by doing it my way they have a helluva lot better chance of playing the 64th best team and not the 200th.
Too bad your comprehension skills were not good enough to understand that.