View Single Post
  #24 (permalink)  
Old Wed Mar 09, 2005, 02:43pm
kdf5 kdf5 is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 622
Quote:
Originally posted by Warrenkicker
Quote:
Originally posted by KWH
[Edited by KWH on Mar 2nd, 2005 at 12:39 PM]
Well I will be the one to say it and maybe mix things up again.

Does B12/B38 entering the field during the play to yell at U equate to him participating? By the description of the play the U was about 25 yards behind the play. When B12/B38 entered to vent his frustrations at U I think you can argue that he did not make any contact with an opponent or touch the ball and does not influence the play. (I am using a comment from the Case Book above 9.6.1 for Illegal Participation Comment 7. The rest of you are using Comment 8 as the basis of your ruling.) This then is a live-ball, non-player foul and the penalty is assessed at the succeeding spot. Using this ruling there are not two live-ball fouls because B12/B38 did not reenter the game. Thus all of the penalties would be enforced on the try, all 50 yards of them as I see it, and the period would be over.
9-6-4-e...It is illegal pariticipation for a disqualified player to re-enter the game. It was determined after the play was over and during penalty enforcement that B12/B38 had been ejected earlier in the game.
Reply With Quote