Quote:
Originally posted by aurabass
As to your first question: I would err on the side of the tie given that overtime would be the fairest solution. The player was definitely trying to shoot a three to tie. She made a very difficult shot. If there is a dispute err on the side of fairness and let the overtime decide the issue.
Great, but that's not what the rules say. There's no "when in doubt go to OT" rule.
|
Doubt existed. The camera angles really can't solve it. One official said three and another two. It's a tie. Play the overtime.
[/B][/QUOTE]
The conference (apparently) disagrees -- they found an angle that shows the foot on the line. Even if they didn't, the general rule-of-thumb / benefit of the doubt is that it's a 2-point shot unless proven to be a 3-point shot.