View Single Post
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Fri Mar 04, 2005, 08:32am
Rick Durkee Rick Durkee is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Winchester, NH
Posts: 184
Quote:
Originally posted by Snaqwells
Where's the provision that states they may not occupy the space? Without that, we need to allow it.

Case book play 8.1.4.b is exactly this play. Allow it.

[Edited by Snaqwells on Mar 3rd, 2005 at 11:26 AM]
Snaqs,

Holy cow! and Yikes!

Thank you for the citation. I never happened across 8.1.4.b on my own, and I am certain nobody ever brought it to my attention. Since the rule was changed (Was it just 2003-2004? I don't have an attic.) I have never seen an official in southern New Hampshire allow (intentionally) an opponent of the free thrower to occupy the second space. I also work with guys from Vermont, and they don't allow it either. Is it possible that whole states missed this or are using their own interpretation? Is it possible that IAABO has an alternate interpretation that we are using? HMM!

I sent the citation to our state interpretor this morning. I can't wait for his response.
__________________
Insert cool signature line here!
Reply With Quote