View Single Post
  #16 (permalink)  
Old Wed Mar 02, 2005, 01:09pm
IRISHMAFIA IRISHMAFIA is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Originally posted by mcrowder
Quote:
Originally posted by IRISHMAFIA
I was not referring to "protest" as in rule 9, but as in complaining about a ruling that didn't happen to sit well with them in spite of the fact that it was brought about due to the inability to manage their team.
I misunderstood you then, because the initial post mentioned that the offense PROTESTED (which seemed to be a rule 9 protest, since UIC was called over and the ruling on the field reviewed), and it seemed it was that action that you were disagreeing with when you said


[/B][/QUOTE]

You're correct. I wasn't even thinking about that, but let's take the next step based on a "protest" premise.

What misinterpretation of what rule are they protesting? It's obvious from the discussion here that there is no rule specific to this scenario.

__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote