Quote:
Originally posted by Mark Padgett
Quote:
Originally posted by Richard Ogg
I know of no way to toss either a player or coach without a flagrant technical. Since I don't have my rule book handy, how do you justify the flagrant by the book? If you just give them a technical and tell them they're gone, it seems they can argue against that with the book on their side.
|
You've got it reversed. If the technical is of such proportion that it demands an ejection by itself, then it IS flagrant.
When you whack them, tell them the T is flagrant and that they are outta here. Then make the baseball umpire tossing motion. Believe me, it's the most fun you can have out there.
|
Agreed. You make the decision as to whether the action warrants flagrant T or not. If you just give them a technical and tell them they're gone, you've just called a flagrant T. No further justification is needed.