[pizanno]

One of the obstacles is a fair ratings/evaluation system. I've yet to see one that I like. Many systems, as Camron pointed out, are just too subjective.

I think there's something to be said for having the best officials available for the good of the game and kids. I had one official state that "if you were a coach at the state tourney, you wouldn't play your second string more than your first "just to spread it around".

That analogy would work if officials only worked four years, then graduated to the next level (or quit).

Therefore, I believe that big-game limitations are necessary to create greater opportunities for younger or less sesoned officials to cultivate their skills in a challenging environment.

This process would making the association stronger as a whole. This should be your approach; avoid the "it's my turn" argument.