View Single Post
  #26 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 21, 2005, 01:43pm
Dan_ref Dan_ref is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Just north of hell
Posts: 9,250
Send a message via AIM to Dan_ref
Quote:
Originally posted by Rich Fronheiser
Quote:
Originally posted by ChrisSportsFan
Quote:
Originally posted by Rich Fronheiser
Quote:
Originally posted by FrankHtown
A1 is entitled to a spot on the floor, even if she's on her back. B1 cannot occupy the same space. I'd call foul on B1 if it was a "dive."
I'm with Bob -- while the player is entitled to the spot on the floor we still have to look at advantage/disadvantage. If the dive was at the ball and caused a held ball, any subsequent contact is pretty much irrelevant, unless "intentional or flagrant."
Must be a pretty small girl if she can dive and land only on the ball.

I'm visualizing this as a foul.
Contact does not equal foul. If she dives in with her hands and wraps up the ball, I don't care if there's some incidental contact. I'm not penalizing agressive play just ecause there may have been a bump on the floor.
I agree with Rich, even if there's a *lot* of incidental contact.
Reply With Quote