Quote:
Originally posted by blindzebra
There are degrees to everything. You are the one who came up with the o' shucks he's just being an advocate for his team nonsense.
The big difference in the two is that one is an automatic T, and the other gets a warning, but both are personal attacks on the job we are doing in the game.
|
No, the big difference is that one is a coach going nuts and the other is a coach making a comment. It wasn't me that came up with the "coach being an advocate" thing (although I wish it were). It was a D-1 ref. I can't diffuse a coach who tosses a clipboard and swears.. he's already gone over the deep end. But I find it quite easy to diffuse a coach who makes the foul count remark. One big reason it's easy is because I don't turn it into a personal attack - because it isn't.
Z