View Single Post
  #68 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 14, 2005, 03:41pm
blindzebra blindzebra is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,674
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Maverick
Quote:
Originally posted by Jurassic Referee
Quote:
Well, I was gonna write up a whole buncha things in rebuttal. But....you wouldn't understand them. Call it any way you want to.
So you don't have a rule book reference to base your claim off of? I stated my rule book reference as requested but I haven't seen anyone be able to counter it with a different reference. I wish I had a nickel for every time you've jumped on someone for saying they're going to call something one way without a rule book reference to back it up.
Fixing timing errors are mentioned twice in the rule book, under officials duties in 2-5 and under timer's errors in 5-10.

We have ad nauseum gave you an example of 5-10 fixing timer's errors, with a comment saying only a timer's error can be fixed.

You have maintained that 2-5 and 5-10 are not connected, that 5-10 only deals with timer's errors and that 2-5 deals with all errors. Well where is a specific reference to fixing an official's error with 2-5-5?

You know a rule with a heading official's error or a case play dealing with this situation, care to give it?

2-5-5 starts out talking about when scorers or timers...note the plural...disagree and correct obvious timing errors. I can argue that this means fixing a timing error caused by the two timers disagreeing. This rule gives the official the authority to fix a timing error under 5-10.

Again, expand on this 2-5-5 claim. Show where it says it is seperate from 5-10.

Reply With Quote